"Putting at the people's disposal the intellectual and technical capital snatched from the colonial universities."
news and views from the multiple centers of an emerging new environmentalism
The Center for Biological Diversity (http://www.biologicaldiversity.org) is making disturbing claims about the relationship of human population growth to species extinction rates. Their analysis on population and climate change is somewhat more nuanced.
According to this graph, they attempt to make the claim that increases in population growth have led to increases in species extinctions since the 1800s.
In high school and college calculus mathematics courses, you learn that more than the actual number of any phenomenon, it is often, when looking for causality, important to actually look at key points where the slope of the graph is changing – to look at the rate of the phenomenon, as well as the changes in the rate, or slope, of a graph. The idea is to look at points in time where things are accelerating or decelerating and look for system drivers at those points.
By the way most of you will know that correlation is *not* the same as establishing causality.
If we look at this graph, you actually see the following trends (marked with arrows):
Now, I assigned the arrows to the graph based on the rates of change in the graph, before I knew what the related dates were.
When I look at the points where the arrows identify conjunctures, correlated with my study of international development and world history, you find that perhaps that changes in species extinctions rates are more related to changes in resource use patterns, in particular of extensive land uses, including industrial agriculture and oil, coal and other fossil fuel exploration, extraction, and development, are more correlated to changes in the rates of species extinctions, than to human rates of population growth, or changes therein.